Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1) Marv and Harry were having corned beef sandwiches in a New York City deli, when Harry saw his acquaintance Kevin walk by the window.

1) Marv and Harry were having corned beef sandwiches in a New York City deli, when Harry saw his acquaintance Kevin walk by the window. Harry excused himself for a moment to say hello and rushed out the door. While Harry was stepping away, the expensive ring he had been fidgeting with slipped to the ground and rolled under the table. Intending to take it for himself, Marv knelt to the ground, picked up the expensive ring, and put it in his pocket. Immediately Marv thought to all the fun adventures he and Harry had shared together and decided to return the ring when Harry returned. When Harry stepped back to his corned beef sandwich Marv slid the ring across the table and explained what occurred. Marv is guilty of

Group of answer choices

Embezzlement

False pretenses.

No crime.

Larceny

Entrapment

2) Attorney Randolph Scott represented the Estate of John C. Bready, Jr. Under the Bready Will, five beneficiaries were to receive $50,000 per year for the rest of their lives, while a sixth beneficiary, a minor, was to receive $50,000 per year until her 21st birthday. The remaining money was to be donated to Temple University. Between December 2010 and October 2016, Scott diverted about $1.8 million in estate funds to his law firm's three accounts and diverted another $570,000 into two of his accounts from checks payable to the Estate. Which crime did Scott commit by transferring funds into his own accounts?

Group of answer choices

Receiving stolen property

Embezzlement

Extortion

Larceny

Robbery

3) Landon Jones is driving a car in which Wilma is a passenger when an accident occurs.Landon and Wilma are emotionally rattled, but neither is physically injured.Landon is not liable to Wilma under a theory of negligence because

Group of answer choices

Landon did not apparently intend to cause an accident.

Wilma must have been comparatively negligent.

Because both parties were emotionally rattled.

Landon does not owe Wilma a legal duty of care.

Wilma was not injured.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Auditing A Practical Approach

Authors: Robyn Moroney

1st Canadian Edition

978-1118472972, 1118472977, 978-1742165943

Students also viewed these Law questions