1) Read the Johnson & Johnson article and answer the following:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/12/business/johnson-johnson-talcum-powder.html

a) was the outcome of this case fair?

b) The Jury awarded a significant amount of punitive damages in this case. Should tort reform laws apply here? If so, why? If not, why?

2) Read the article about Samsungand its arbitration clause in its warranty and answer the following:

https://www.consumerreports.org/consumerist/supreme-court-allows-for-rare-win-in-customers-lawsuit-against-samsung/

is it really any different whether the arbitration clause was in the terms of use or in the warrants, i.e. would the consumer have been more likelyto read it either way?

3) Why would a company want to offer an express warranty on its product?