1. The "Duty to Consult" requires government to consult First Nations groups before infringing the rights those groups have in land. Do you think government should be required to secure First Nations' groups full consent for projects that would infringe those groups' rights? The alternative to full consent is accommodation where practicable.

(Take as an example if the government wants to build a hydroelectric dam in a location where a First Nations group has traditionally fished

2. You are a lawyer representing a First Nations group. A controversial pipeline project is going through the group's traditional land, and you believe the group was not adequately consulted by the government. However, before proving that they were not consulted you have to prove that aboriginal title exists in the lan

What specific actions would you take to prove aboriginal title in the lan

3. Explain why BC is the location of many developments in aboriginal law in Canad

a.d?d.). Canada.