1: Understanding Ethical and Legal Decision-Making in Denise's Project: In your exploration of Denise's project and its relation to the housing crisis in Tasmania, discuss the concepts of 'ethical decision-making' and 'legal decision-making.' How do these two principles apply to Denise's specific project? Consider the importance of adhering to legal requirements and regulations, as well as the ethical implications of her decisions and actions. Provide concrete examples to illustrate the intersection of legal compliance and ethical considerations in her project. Question 2: Evaluating the Ethical Nature of Denise's Decisions and Actions: Share your opinion on whether Denise's decisions and actions, which meet all the legal requirements of her projects, can be deemed inherently ethical. Formulate a well-reasoned rationale to support your argument, considering the broader implications of her choices beyond legal compliance. Consider the potential impacts on stakeholders, the community, and vulnerable populations, and how ethical decision-making transcends mere adherence to legal standards. Question 3: Unravelling the Adverse Effects of Legally Endorsed Decisions on Communities: Examine the significant adverse effects that decisions and actions legally endorsed in Denise's project may have on communities, with particular attention to environmental, social, and economic aspects in the long term. Draw from in-depth