1.Case Analysis: Analyze the case of Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223 and outline the following: 1.1 Facts of

Question

57 users unlocked this solution today!

1.Case Analysis: Analyze the case of Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223 and outline the following: 1.1 Facts of the case (very brief) 1.2 Principle of law forthcoming 2. Identify at least 1 current case in your respective jurisdiction that either confirms or rejects the Wednesbury reasonableness principle. You are to briefly identify the facts of the case and then identify how the principle was applied to the facts of the case. 3. Problem scenario: Assume that there is an island state within the USP region called 'Malidova'. The Re-Design Act (2020) of Malidova (the 'Re-De Act') states in its sections as follows: 1. This Act may be cited as the Re-De Act. 2.In this Act, unless the context requires otherwise - "Council" means the local authority constituted under this Act. 3.There shall be a Council established in Malidova. 4.The Council shall carry out the duties imposed and the functions conferred on it by the Act. 5.Where application is made to the Council for permission to change the use of premises, the Council may grant permission for any significant change of use of premises in Malidova, subject to such conditions as it thinks reasonably fit. 6.The Council also gains authority from relevant health and safety regulations of Malidova. Bruce recently purchased premises in Malidova. He applied to the Council for permission to change the way he uses his premises from a small storage warehouse to an evening Jazz Bar. The Council granted permission for the change of use of the premises subject to the following conditions / changes or additions to be made to the premises (with the total cost-burden placed on Bruce): Advise Bruce as to whether he could challenge any of these conditions by judicial review with reasoning. (In your answer, you should refer to the review grounds for such challenge and rely on case authority where appropriate). If you think that facts are missing, you should assume those facts but clearly say so. A better answer may consider multiple outcomes where appropriate, pending on the circumstances. a. Ramps and rails for disabled people; b. The exterior of the premises must be repainted in rainbow colours; c. Minimum of 5 cubicles in both male and female toilets with 1 bigger cubicle for disabled persons; d. Separate loading bay and entrance for cargo and supplies; e. Crystal chandeliers; f. Sound proofing. g. Skate Board ramp. h. Maintaining the costs for running a boat ramp, as (we are now assuming) the premises are located on a house boat.