1.consider the following statement: "Government -funded projects intended to serve as "prestige projects", such as the Millennium, should not be judged on the basis of cost." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?.

2. Does O₂'s decision to take over the site and spend an additional 600 million to develop it make sense?. Under what circumstances could this site become a money maker for the investor?.( 3.) What are lessons to be learned from the Millennium Dome debacle?. Was this a failure of revenue estimation or simply excessive optimism by the British Government?-----(case study 8.2 London's Millennium Dome. Book- project management by Jeffry k. Pinto)