1.Don Eliseo, father of Armando, owned two (2) parcels of land consisting of 500 sq. m. and 451 sq. m. located at Antipolo City. The two (2) parcels of land were sold to Honrado at P1,000,000.00 and P750,000.00, respectively. Armando, contending that the contract price for the two (2) parcels of land was grossly inadequate, tried to negotiate with Honrado to increase the purchase price. When Honrado refused, Armando then filed a complaint for annulment of sale. Honrado alleged that the contract of sale was null and void on the ground that Don Eliseo, at that time, already had senile dementia. Honrado, on the other hand, contended that Armando had effectively ratified both contracts of sales, by receiving the consideration offered in each transaction.

a.What is the status of the contracts of sale?

b.What remedy does Armando have, if any?

2.Abel sued Cain for partition of the lots inherited by both parties from their deceased father. Cain, however, moved to dismiss on the ground that some years before a final and executory judgment (based on a compromise agreement) involving the same parties, same subject matter, and same causes of action had already been rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, and that therefore the doctrine of res judicata clearly bars the present case. Abel contends that said judgment is void because the compromise agreement had been signed in their behalf by their lawyer who had not been authorized by them to enter into such agreement, and consequently, there can be no res judicata. What is the status of the compromise agreement?

3.Robin and Rommel entered into an agreement wherein Rommel will deliver the drugs Robin is selling to a prospective buyer. Two (2) months have passed and yet the contract was not executed. Robin has been harassing Rommel to fulfill the agreement. What is the status of the agreement?