1.What factors did the court say it considered in determining where a party is domiciled (and therefore has citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction in federal courts)?

2.Assume that a student who graduated from high school in Hawaii attends college in Oregon. What factors should influence the determination of where that student is domiciled?

3.Can you think of any policy reasons for the need for the federal courts to have subject-matter jurisdiction in diversity of citizenship cases, as these cases could be decided in state courts?