2. Brad began working at Lay-Z-Guy in 1981 as a customer service manager. In 1995

his employer started requiring him and other salespeople to sign a series of one-year

agreements that stated they could be terminated on 60 days' notice. Three years

later it required Brad to incorporate, and from that point forward, the agreements

were between Lay-Z-Gufy and Brad's corporation. The agreements defined Brad, and

later his corporation, as an "independent marketing consultant" and expressly stated

that the relationship was not one of employment, but rather of an independent

contractor-principal. Brad paid for his own office space and remitted his own income

taxes and workers' compensation premiums. At the same time, Lay-Z-Guy set prices,

territory, and promotional methods and Brad was limited to servicing Lay-Z-Guy

exclusively. In 2003, Lay-Z-Guy terminated the agreement with 60 days' notice. Brad

sued for wrongful dismissal damages, alleging that he was an employee.

What arguments could Brad make to support his position that he was an employee?