2. Thomas, a poor university student,and his millionaire dad enter into an arrangement where thomas agrees that he will keep the front and backyards of the family property mowed,and he will' do-a- bit' to keep the gardens looking tidy. In return, his dad agrees to pay him a weekly allowance of $200. His dad had previously used a garden contractor to do the job and paid him $350. They live on a large property,and the mowing alone takes half a day a week. After four weeks, thomas's dad tells him that he cannot afford to pay $200 a week. He says that thomas should be doing the work for nothing, as it is the responsibility of the whole family to look after the property;besides, he says, thomas is getting free board and lodging. Advice thomas on whether there is a contract between him and his dad which the court will enforce.

Required: Answer this question using the IRAC* method.

3. Oliver, while he was so drunk that he didn't know what he was doing, bid successfully at an auction for the purchase of a house. It was clear to the auctioneer that oliver didn't know what he was doing, however after oliver sobered up, he confirmed that contract with the auctioneer. He then subsequently refused to complete the contact. Is oliver bound to the contract

Required: answer the question using IRAC* method

4. What arguments can a seller put forward for limiting the scope of section 54 on acceptable quality found in the Australian consumer law (ACL)