38) In 2002, Australia's highest court ruled on a defamation case in which an Australian citizen claimed to have defamed by a Dow Jones article published on the defendant's website. The court found that the citizen was des in A) and jurisdiction over Dow Jones was established because under American law, the defendant's website and sufficiently established minimum contacts, creating jurisdiction. B) but jurisdiction over Dow Jones couldn't be established because the defendant's servers wer had been uploaded in the United States, so it was considered published in the United States been active e in America and the artic and not subject to Australiar but jurisdiction over Dow Jones couldn't be established because the defendant had no physical presence in Australia was inter aw and publication of the article occurred when the article appeared and could be read on a user's computer screen, stablishing jurisdiction in Australia