4. In class we studied the trust behavior of many individuals in six Latin American cities. Is the subgame perfect equilibrium in the trust game that was done in this study consistent with the theoretical predictions in economics? Explain your answer in detail.

important information: mention the hypothesis or prediction listed on the slides for social capital then about how the game was set up and why it was set up like that. mention a theory that aligns with the result.. think peer pressure... ending the answer with an economic theory that this experiment contradicts

Please include the following sentence in the answer: (0,0) is the sub-game perfect Nast equilibrium of this game. Thus, the theoretical prediction is that Player 1 will send zero offers, as they cannot assure that player 2 will return any amount.