Question
4.2 Free Speech North Carolina enacted a criminal statute that makes it a felony for a registered sex offender to access social networking websites, such
4.2 Free Speech
North Carolina enacted a criminal statute that makes it a felony for a registered sex offender to access social networking websites, such as Facebook, where the sex offender knows that the site permits minor children to become members, or to create or maintain personal web pages. The statute permits sex offenders to use commercial transaction websites such as Amazon.com. North Carolina has prosecuted more than 1,000 individuals for violating the statute.
When Lester Gerard Packingham was a 21-year-old college student he had sex with a 13-year-old girl. He pleaded guilty to taking indecent liberties with a child. Packingham was required to register as a sex offendera status that can endure for 30 years or more. Eight years after his conviction, while Packingham resided in North Carolina, he began posting messages on Facebook. He did not contact a minor or engage in any illicit act on the internet. North Carolina indicted Packingham for the crime of using social media in violation of state law. At trial, Packingham asserted that the North Carolina law violated his First Amendment free speech rights. Does the North Carolina statute that prohibits registered sex offenders from using social media websites violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment? Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S.Ct. 1730, 2017 U.S. Lexis 3871 (Supreme Court of the United States, 2017)
4.3 Equal Protection Clause
Greensburg Community School Corporation is a public school located in Greensburg, Indiana. The school includes a junior high school and a high school. The school has a policy that boys who want to play on the school's basketball teams must keep their hair cut short. No such similar rule applies to girls who play on the girls' basketball teams. A.H., a male student, qualified to play on the high school basketball team but was not permitted to do so because he had long hair and refused to cut it. A.H.'s parent sued the school, alleging sex discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Does the school's haircut policy constitute sex discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause? Hayden v. Greensburg Community School Corporation, 743 F.3d 569 (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2014)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started