5. Plaintiff is a prisoner in a California state prison. He has filed an action in a federal district court against prison officials for violating his constitutional right to adequate health care. Specifically, his complaint alleges that the named prison officials "violated my constitutional right to adequate health care when they removed me from appropriate treatment that they placed me on." The facts alleged by Plaintiff were that he was placed on treatment and then removed from that treatment. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6). Which best describes how the court should rule consistent with prevailing Supreme Court precedent? A. Grant the motion. The pleading is implausible because the more likely cause of harm is Plaintiff's underlying illness. B. Grant the motion. The pleading lacks factual basis for relief and merely alleges legal conclusions. C. Deny the motion once and give Plaintiff leave to amend. If Plaintiff cannot come up with more specific allegations, the court should then dismiss the action. D. Deny the motion. The pleading is sufficient to put Defendants on fair f what the what the