50). X, AN INTERIOR DESIGNER, AGREES TO DECORATE Y'S LIVING ROOM FOR A SPECIFIED PRICE, WITH THE CONTRACT PROVIDING THAT X GUARANTEES Y'S "TOTAL SATISFACTION" WITH THE JOB. WHEN THE WORK IS DONE, Y CLAIMS HE IS NOT SATISFIED. IN SUCH A CASE: (A) IF THE COURT FEELS THE CONTRACT WAS ONE ESSENTIALLY INVOLVING SUBJECTIVE MATTERS, SUCH AS Y'S PERSONAL COLOR LIKES AND DISLIKES, AND IF Y'S DISSATISFACTION IS GENUINE, Y MAY ESCAPE LIABILITY TO X (B) IF THE COURT FEELS THAT A REASONABLE MAN WOULD HAVE BEEN SATISFIED WITH X'S PERFORMANCE, EVEN THOUGH IT ESSENTIALLY INVOLVED SUBJECTIVE MATTERS AS IN (A) ABOVE, Y WILL PROBABLY BE HELD LIABLE TO X. (C) IF THE COURT FEELS THE CONTRACT WAS ONE ESSENTIALLY INVOLVING MATTERS OF UTILITY OR MERE MECHANICAL FITNESS (RATHER THAN SUBJECTIVE MATTERS), Y WILL PROBABLY BE HELD LIABLE EVEN IF HE IS PERSONALLY DISSATISFIED AND EVEN IF A REASONABLE MAN WOULD BE DISSATISFIED WITH X'S WORK. (D) BAND C (E) A AND B