7. Notice of revocation must reach the offerte before she has accepted. a True b. False 8. In Chapter 11. Problem 16, we reviewed a matter wherein the plaintif, Victor H. Francois, moved to have an agreement set aside as a result of undue influence. The agreement was between him and his wife, Jane Francois, and, in the agreement, he transferred most of his remaining assets to Jane while in a troubled marriage. Which of the following statements will apply in his case against Jane? a. The court will consider whether the tree wil of Victor was subverted by Jane in order to obtain assent to an agreement b. The degree of persuasion that's necessary to constitute undue influence varies from case to case c. The particular transaction will be scrutinized to determine if the agreement was truly the product of a free and independent mind. d. Al of the above 9. Ita contract is within the Statute of Frauds, a must be in writing and signed by the party against whom the contract is to be enforced. b. False a True 10. Sharon told Douglas that he would marry her, she would convey to him the pet supply store that she inherited from her father Douglas can rely on Sharon's oral promise because it was made between two parties to the marriage b. Douglas must got Sharon's promise in writing and signed by her in order to enforce. 11. NasRUs, Inc., agreed to buy from Gelco, Inc., as much al gel polish as Natsus might desire to order at a price of $14.7 per caso. NaisRUs ordered 1000 cases of nal gol polish. Gekoolvered 500 cases and said that wouldn't deliver any more. NailsRUs sued Gelco for damages based on the failure to deliver the additional 500 cases of the order a. The underlying agreement contained an illusory promise which did not bind NailsRUs to the agreement. Consequently, Gelco is not bound other The underlying agreement is enforceable because it is a requirements contract 12. Joshua owed Mira $3,000 for services rendered to Joshua. The debt was due on May 1, 2010. As of December 16, 2010, the debt was still unpaid. Mira was financially struggling and desperately needed money to she told Joshua that he paid her $2,000 immediately, she would release him from the balance. Joshua paid Mira $2.000 and confirmed with her that all claims were considered paid in M. On January 2, 2020, Mira demanded the unpaid balance and then we Joshua when to faled to pay Mira will win because under the common tw, Joshua's partial payment of an undisputed debt is not sufficient consideration for Miro's promise to discharge the remainder of the debt. b. Joshua wil win because the UCC alows Mirato renounce her right to the remainder of the debt that Jouhua owes her