7) On May 12, 2003, a bright young college student, Vic Tim, the son of prominent members of the community, is brutally attacked on his way home from school by a young male. He is severely beaten and his wallet is stolen. The attacker runs from the scene. When the police arrive Vic Tim tells them what happened and insists he can identify his attacker. No one was arrested that night. The next day while on routine patrol, Ofcer Catchem receives information from Will Tell who witnessed the crime. He stated that he knew the individual who attacked Vic Tim, that the attacker is W. Ho Me, and he is currently in his house located at 12 Eudidit Street. Ofcer Catchem immediately calls his commander to obtain a warrant. A two ofcer back up unit meets Ofcer Catchem at the suspect's address. The three ofcers knock on the door even though they don't have a warrant yet and a young male opens the door slightly, while the safety chain is still connected. The Ofcers ask for Who Me, and the person inside the house says he isn't home. Ofcer Catchem notices that the person at the door has a black object in his hand, and fearing for his life, draws his gun and pushes the door open, breaking the safety chain. The person on the inside, who was later identied as W. Ho Me, fell to the oor in the hallway. Laying beside him is the black object which turned out to be his hairbrush,. Ofcer Catchem and his back up unit cuff W. Ho Me. One of the ofcers looks into the kitchen and sees a wallet on the kitchen table. He retrieves the wallet, looks inside of it and determined that it belonged to Vic Tim. W. Ho Me is formally placed under arrest. At the suppression hearing to suppress the evidence, the prosecutor argued that the search was valid because the police had probable cause to arrest W. Ho Me, there were exigent circumstances, the search was incident to a lawful arrest, and the evidence was in plain view. Question: - You are the defense attorney. Make the arguments in opposition to all of the prosecutor's