9.Mrs. Vogel bought a Rangers baseball ticket from Rally Tickets. At the stadium on game day, the ticket taker scanned her ticket and told her that it had already been used so she could not enter. The next day, Mrs. Vogel stood on the public sidewalk outside Rally Tickets for four hours holding a sign that said, "Rally Tickets Sold Me a Fake Ticket". No one went into Rally Tickets the whole time that Mrs. Vogel was there with her sign. In order for Rally to recover for defamation, Rally must show that:

a. ____ Rally suffered an actual economic loss because of Mrs. Vogel and her sign

b. ____ Mrs. Vogel's ticket was genuine

c. ____ Mrs. Vogel's protest was posted on the internet or shown in a news report

d. ____ Rally refunded Mrs. Vogel's purchase price for the ticket

23.In a state where pure comparative negligence applies, Nina's recovery may be reduced

a. ____ only if Nina was equally at fault as Opal

b. ____ to zero, if Nina if found to have any portion of the fault

c. ____ only if Nina was more at fault than Opal

d. ____ by Nina's proportionate share of negligence, even if Nina was only slightly at fault

24.If the state has a contributory negligence law, instead of comparative negligence, Nina's recovery will:

a. ____ be unaffected, as long as she is less at fault than Opal

b. ____ be barred if Nina is 50% or more at fault

c. ____ be absolutely barred if Nina has any fault

d. ____ be reduced by the percentage of Nina's own fault