A client died, leaving behind a will that allows specific distribution of tangible personal property by a separate writing. During the last days of her life, the client dictated a separate writing to a trusted friend because she could no longer write. The trusted friend, subsequently and shortly after the client's death, wrote the items down and had the separate writing witnessed by a neighbor who was present when the client dictated the list.

Based on the above information, answer the following questions:

• One of the remaining beneficiaries might contest the contents of the handwritten memorandum. How does the term extrinsic evidence apply to this situation?
• Because the client did not write the memo but dictated it, and the scrivener wrote it down after the death of the client, what result do you think will occur from litigation over this matter?
• Would a "no contest" provision have changed the outcome here?

Justify your ideas and responses by using appropriate examples and references from Lexis Advance (including primary sources such as cases, statutes, rules, regulations, etc.), government Web sites, peer-reviewed legal periodicals (not lawyer blogs), which can besupplementedby law dictionaries or the textbook. This means you need to use more than just your text and legal dictionaries.