A food safety inspector is called upon to check on a restaurant's sanitation practices. He used testing hypothesis to make his conclusion.

Null Hypothesis: The restaurant meets food safety regulations.

Alternate Hypothesis: The restaurant does not meet food safety regulations. $($Alternate hypothesis requires evidence$).$

If the food inspector decides that the restaurant is in violation, its license to operate could be revoked.

Identify Type $2$ error here.

The inspector decides the restaurant is in violation, when actually it has maintained proper food safety regulations

The inspector decides the restaurant is not in violation, when actually it has violated many food safety regulations

The restaurant meets food safety regulations.

The restaurant does not meet food safety regulations.