A. In groups of 5, you are to develop and write a 600 word case about an ethical dilemma within a selected company (name to stay anonymous), and then answer the following questions: (18 points) (ILOS: A1, A3, C1, C2, C3, D2, D3, D4) 1. Identify and explain the ethical dilemma in the case. And explain who is in the dilemma? What type of conflict is the ethical dilemma in your developed case? Explain why you think so. 3. Which of the two methods (greater good or golden-rule) would you use to resolve the conflict? Explain why you think so. 4. Identify and explain which Stakeholder(s) would be directly affected by the consequences of the ethical dilemma. s. Identify and explain which organizational department(s) would be directly accountable for this dilemma. If the dilemma was to escalate to the Board of directors, which of the three committees would be responsible to address the issue? Explain why you think so. 7. What type(s) of CSR does the company practice? Explain by giving examples x. What mechanism (procedures) has the company established to manage the internal whistle blowing process? What policies has the company established to protect against Cyberliability? Together you are to grally present your case and your answers to the given questions (6 points) (ILOS: DI) c. In order to help develop your case, you may collect the necessary data about the company you have selected from: (3 points) (ILOs: A2) -Company's website -Interviewing selected company managers - Journal articles and official news articles online D. Structure of the assignment report: (3 points) (ILOS: DI, D2) 1. Your report must have a cover page containing (Course code and course title, all members' names and STD numbers, plus the submission date) 2. Then, in 600 words, explain the ethical dilemma and the details of what happened. Make sure to include the following in your case: Brief company history, geographic scope, range of operations, and business sector. - Describe the dilemma in story format clarifying all staff members and departments involved in the dilemma. (Do not mention any individual staff member's name). - Show what are the key lessons in this case that are vital for other regional companies. 3. Next, answer all the given questions. Clearly number your answers from 1 to 9. There is no need to write the question. x. What mechanism (procedures) has the company established to manage the internal whistle blowing process? What policies has the company established to protect against Cyberliability? Together you are to orally present your case and your answers to the given questions. (6 points) (ILOS: DI) c. In order to help develop your case, you may collect the necessary data about the company you have selected from: (3 points) (ILOs: A2) Company's website -Interviewing selected company managers - Journal articles and official news articles online D. Structure of the assignment report: (3 points) (ILOS: DI, D2) 1. Your report must have a cover page containing: (Course code and course title, all members' names and STD numbers, plus the submission date) 2. Then, in 600 words, explain the ethical dilemma and the details of what happened. Make sure to include the following in your case: - Brief company history, geographic scope, range of operations, and business sector. Describe the dilemma in story format clarifying all staff members and departments involved in the dilemma. (Do not mention any individual staff member's name). - Show what are the key lessons in this case that are vital for other regional companies. 1. Next, answer all the given questions. Clearly number your answers from 1 to 9. There is no need to write the question. + Add a Reference list in the end of your report. Absents of references in any report will be considered as plagiarism. Your reference list must include: All books, textbooks, journal articles, company web sites, and newspapers and magazines which content have been used to build your case. Use Harvard Referencing style for your reference list: http://libraryguides.vu.edu.au harvard reference-formats-and- examples Run your report through Turn-it-In and attach the main page, containing the similarity index, to the end of your report. The similarity index should be less than 15%. Late reports will have grade deduction per day.