A) is it plausible that game players and non-game players are basically the same in response time? If not which group is faster, (with a smaller response time) question?Must choose one:-plausible to be basically the same-Not plausible to be the same, and game players are faster-not possible to be the same, and non-game players are fasterB) is it possible that game players and non-game players are basically the same and accuracy?If not which group is more accurate?Choose one:-plausible to be basically the same-not plausible to be the same, and game players are more accurate-not plausible to be the same, and non-game players are more accurate

Question 11 of 13 View Policies Current Attempt in Progress Playing Video Games A new study provides some evidence that playing action video games strengthens a person's ability to translate sensory information quickly into accurate decisions. Researchers had 23 male volunteers with an average age of 20 look at moving arrays on a computer screen and indicate the direction in which the dots were moving. Half of the volunteers (11 men) reported playing action video games at least five times a week for the previous year, while the other 12 reported no video game playing in the previous year. The response time and the accuracy score were both measured. A 95 % confidence interval for the mean response time for game players minus the mean response time for non-players is - 1.8 to - 1.2 seconds, while a 95 % confidence interval for mean accuracy score for game players minus mean accuracy score for non-players is - 4.2 to + 5.8. 1Green, et al., "Improved probabilistic inference as a general learning mechanism with action video games," Current Biology, 2010; 20(September 14): 1. (a) Is it plausible that game players and non-game players are basically the same in response time? If not, which group is faster