A multinational pharmaceutical company is implementing a comprehensive talent management strategy to enhance its competitive advantage in research and development (R&D). The strategy includes coaching, mentoring, and leadership development interventions. After a year of implementation, the company observes mixed results: some R&D teams have significantly improved their performance, while others have shown no change or even declined. As the head of HR, you are tasked with diagnosing the issue. Which combination of factors should you prioritize investigating to understand the disparate outcomes? Group of answer choices Implementation speed of the talent management strategy, differences in job roles, and number of employees per team. Frequency of team meetings, availability of research funding, and office layout. Variability in coaching techniques, cultural differences across teams, and alignment of leadership development with R&D goals. General employee satisfaction levels, annual performance bonuses, and standardization of HR policies