A number related instructor asserts that she has built up a survey course that expands the scores of understudies on the mathematical part of a school placement test. In light of information from the head of the test, scores are ordinarily appropriated with u = 511. The educator acquires an irregular example of 2200 understudies, gets them through the audit class, and tracks down that the mean mathematical score of the 2200 understudies is 517 with a standard deviation of 112. Complete parts (a) through (d) beneath. (a) Express the invalid and elective speculations. Leave u alone the mean score. Pick the right answer beneath. O A. Ho: H > 511, H1: H#511 O B. Ho: H = 511, H1: 1 > 511 O C. Ho: H <511, H1: M> 511 O D. Ho: H = 511, H1: H#511 (b) Test the theory at the a = 0.10 degree of importance. Is a mean numerical score of 517 measurably essentially higher than 511? Direct a speculation test utilizing the P-esteem approach. Discover the test measurement. to = (Round to two decimal places depending on the situation.) Discover the P-esteem. The P-esteem is. (Round to three decimal places as needed.)Is the example mean genuinely fundamentally higher? O No O Yes (c) Do you believe that a mean mathematical score of 517 versus 511 will influence the choice of a school affirmations manager? At the end of the day, does the increment in the score have any pragmatic importance? O No, on the grounds that the score turned out to be just 1.17% more noteworthy. O Indeed, in light of the fact that each increment in score is essentially huge. (d) Test the speculation at the a = 0.10 degree of importance with n = 375 understudies. Accept that the example mean is as yet 517 and the example standard deviation is as yet 112. Is an example mean of 517 essentially more than 511? Direct a theory test utilizing the P-esteem approach. Discover the test measurement. to = (Round to two decimal places depending on the situation.) Discover the P-esteem. The P-esteem is. (Round to three decimal places depending on the situation.)

%50$

Is the example mean measurably fundamentally higher? O No O Yes What do you close about the effect of huge examples on the P-esteem? O A. As n builds, the probability of dismissing the invalid speculation increments. Notwithstanding, enormous examples will in general overemphasize basically irrelevant contrasts. O B. As n expands, the probability of not dismissing the invalid theory increments. In any case, enormous examples will in general overemphasize for all intents and purposes huge contrasts. O C. As n expands, the probability of dismissing the invalid theory increments. Notwithstanding, enormous examples will in general overemphasize basically critical contrasts. O D. As n builds, the probability of not dismissing the invalid speculation increments. Notwithstanding, enormous examples will in general overemphasize essentially unimportant contrasts.