A qualitative research scheme where individual interviews are used as a method for collection of data Despite the fact that the management thinks that interviews are a well-suited method for collecting data, they see that there are both advantages and disadvantages associated with this method and they, therefore, need yours help to specify the research plan in more detail. Tasks: 

Note: Read the entire assignment text before starting the answer! Task 1 (counts 30%): Specify and specify the problem. That is, you are asked to identify and describe: i ) the variables ii) the survey units iii) what you consider to be an appropriate sample for the survey Justify your answers. Task 2 (counts 30%): Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the survey plan and the chosen method (interview) for data collection. Suggest an alternative survey plan and method for collecting data. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative survey scheme. Task 3 (counts 30%) NOKUT wants you to discuss important trade-offs that must be made to ensure the survey's validity and reliability. In other words, what trade-offs must be made to ensure the validity of this survey? Task 4 (counts 10%) Briefly describe the basic ethical requirements that you as a researcher must take into account in this particular case the project? (5 sentences max) 

IMPORTANT: A research outline means that you must outline a possible procedure for answering the problem, and say something about the type of answer you can get based on the possible ones the data collection methods. It is not intended that one should try to give any answer the problem or the research question. Evaluation criteria: All assignments must be answered with an academic text, which means that discussions and reflections must be professionally justified. Use theory from the syllabus and feel free to supplement it with reflections and discussions from the teaching. The following applies to all tasks: If you think you are missing some information to be able to answer the task, or you think the task needs more clarity limitations, you can define your own assumptions and limitations for your answer. If you do this, it is important that the assumptions/limitations you define are clearly stated your answer. 

According to the extent to which you are able to identify the variables to be is measured in the given context and your knowledge of operationalization. In task 2, your answer is evaluated according to the extent to which you are able to apply the required knowledge be achieved in the subject by discussing a specific choice of research design and what this choice is like decisive for how you will collect data. And in addition to what extent you can discuss benefits and disadvantages of the choice of method and the survey plan. In task 3, your answer is evaluated according to the extent to which you are able to draw in important aspects of the validity of the research scheme that you outline. In task 4, your answer is evaluated according to the extent to which you show independence when formulating and conveys own reflections related to ethical issues and dilemmas that may arise in a research project. It is permitted to use the "I" form in the answer to task 4, but the answer must nevertheless be academically and professionally justified.