Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

A report on case of Supreme Court of Canada Case number is 38613. Expain the two part: Part A includes the hearing, summary of facts,

A report on case of Supreme Court of Canada Case number is 38613. Expain the two part: Part A includes the hearing, summary of facts, Defendant's argument, decision and reasons. In Part-B expain about Impressions.

This is the case.
image text in transcribed
w Word X w Document X Supreme X Supreme X spx?cas=38613# Summary 38613 Attorney General of Quebec, et al. v. 9147-0732 Quebec inc. (Quebec) (Criminal) (By Leave) Keywords Canadian charter (Non-criminal) - Constitutional law, Cruel and unusual treatment or punishment (s. 12) - Charter of Rights - Cruel and unusual treatment or punishment - Application of Charter rights to legal persons - Statement of offence issued against business corporation for carrying out construction work as contractor without holding current licence - Provincial building legislation providing for mandatory minimum fine of $30,843 - Whether legal person can benefit from protection of section 12 of Charter - Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 12 - Building Act, CQLR, C. B 1.1, ss. 46, 197.1. Summary Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only. The respondent, a private company, was issued a statement of offence under the Quebec Building Act for carrying out certain construction work as a contractor without holding a current licence for that purpose. Under s. 197.1 of the Act, the penalty for such an offence is a mandatory fine for a minimum amount that varies depending on who the offender is, that is, whether the offender is a natural person or a legal person. The respondent filed a notice of intention to question the constitutionality of the fine provided for in s. 197.1, arguing that the fine violated its right to be protected against "any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment" under s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At trial, the Court of Quebec held that it was not necessary to rule on the issue of the application of s. 12 of the Charter to legal persons, because the minimum fine at issue was at any rate not cruel and unusual. The respondent was found guilty, and a fine of $30,843 was imposed. On appeal, the Quebec Superior Court affirmed that decision and added that legal persons such as the respondent could not benefit from the protection of s. 12 of the Charter. A majority of the Quebec Court of Appeal set aside the decisions of the lower courts and held that s. 12 of the Charter can in fact apply to legal persons. The matter was returned to the trial court to rule on the specific issue of the fine provided for in s. 197.1 of the Act. Date modified: 2016-05-02

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Evidence

Authors: Chris Taylor

5th Edition

1292210192, 978-1292210193

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What would you do to reduce the deficit?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

2. Information that comes most readily to mind (availability).

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

3. An initial value (anchoring).

Answered: 1 week ago