A state statute requires all businesses that use certain hazardous chemicals on their premises to have eye$-$washing equipment for the protection of employees using the chemicals. Jokic operates a business that uses various hazardous chemicals. Embiid is on Jokic's business premises and is injured. Under which of the following circumstances does Embiid have the best chance of successfully asserting a negligence per se claim:

A$.$ Embiid is a customer and suffers eye injuries while on the premises when chemicals spill on his face from a shelf he bumped into and Jokic had no eye$-$washing equipment on his premises.

B$.$ Embiid works for an office supply company and suffers eye injuries when chemicals spill on his face from a shelf he bumped into while he was delivering supplies on Jokic's business premises, and Jokic had no eye$-$washing equipment on his premises.

C$.$ Embiid works for Jokic and is injured when chemicals spill on his face from a shelf he bumped into and Jokic had no eye$-$washing equipment on his premises.

D$.$ Embiid works for Jokic and his foot is injured when a large canister holding hazardous chemicals falls on his foot while he is working, and Jokic has not eye$-$washing equipment on his premises.