About the law case Wood v Television New Zealand

please help to analyse according to the following

1 When did the individual employment agreement Ms Wood signed with TVNZ on 1

December 2004 say her employment would end? What was her salary under this

agreement?

2 The Board of TVNZ had a process of "bargaining licences" when dealing with highly paid

staff. What did the Board of TVNZ and the Remuneration and Human Resources

Committee propose in terms of negotiating with Ms Wood?

3 How did Ms Wood feel about the new offer of employment made to her?

4 What were the reasons the Authority member identified as to why the Employment

Relations Act "imposes stringent requirements for fixed-term employments"?

5 Did the Authority member find that Ms Wood was advised when and how her

employment was to end and the reasons for it? Why/why not?

6 What did clause 1 of Ms Wood's employment agreement say about why her

employment was to end on 31 December 2005? Why was this found to "deficient" in

terms of complying with section 66(4)(b) of the Employment Relations Act 2000?

7 What is the effect of a contravention of section 66(4)(b) and what did this mean for Ms

Wood in this particular case?

8 Related to the above question, what did the finding of the Authority member mean in

terms of Ms Woods' salary?