Acme Corp , a calendar year end company, has multiple uncertain tax positions (UTPs) related to its 2018 federal tax return Some UTPs met the more likelythan not recognition threshold on the basis of 3D Printing's initial assessment while others did not During 2019, the IRS audited the 2018 tax return During Q3 2019, the examining agents verbally indicated the preliminary conclusion on certain UTPs, and the IRS and Acme formalized their agreement on these UTPs by signing IRS Form 906, Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters, in Q4 2019 Subsequently, in Q1 2020, the IRS completed its examination of the 2018 tax return whereby the IRS and Acme agreed to the final closing agreement Acme does not intend to appeal or litigate any aspects of the examined UTPs, and it is remote that the IRS would examine or reexamine any aspects of the 2018 federal tax return Refer to the table below for further facts on each of the UTPs Met Recognition Threshhold Amount of Tax BenefitLiability Recognized in the Financial Statements Specifically Examined Verbally Communicated In Q3 Listed on Q4 Form 906 Benefit Sustained UTP 1 Yes 60 Yes Yes Yes 40 UTP 2 No 0 No No No UTP 3 Yes 20 Yes No Yes 100 UTP 4 Yes 65 Yes Yes No 50 UTP 5 Yes 70 No No No UTP 6 No 0 Yes No Yes 100 Required 1 For each tax position taken on its 2018 federal tax return a When can Acme assert an effective settlement b When should Acme adjust previously recognized amounts in the financial statements, if any 2 Does Acme have a basis to change its assessment of similar tax positions taken in other periods if it concludes it meets the effective settlement conditions related to the UTPs included in its 2018 tax return Provide authoritative support for positions taken Represents the amount of the tax benefit liability from the UTP the company recognized For example, if the UTP resulted in a decrease of $100,000 to the overall tax liability and 70 of the benefit was recognized, the company recorded a $70,000 liability associated with the UTP assuming a liability would be recognized Represents the percentage of the benefit taken under the UTP that the IRS allows after audit For example, if the UTP reduced the total tax liability by $100,000 and the IRS allows 70 of the UTP, Acme would owe an additional $30,000 in taxes as a result of the audit This amount is unknown if the IRS has not completed their audit of the UTP

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 27, 2024

Acme Corp. , a calendar-year-end company, has multiple uncertain tax positions (UTPs) related to its 2018 federal tax return. Some UTPs met the more-likelythan-not recognition

Acme Corp. , a calendar-year-end company, has multiple uncertain tax positions (UTPs) related to its 2018 federal tax return. Some UTPs met the more-likelythan-not recognition threshold on the basis of 3D Printing's initial assessment while others did not. During 2019, the IRS audited the 2018 tax return. During Q3 2019, the examining agents verbally indicated the preliminary conclusion on certain UTPs, and the IRS and Acme formalized their agreement on these UTPs by signing IRS Form 906, "Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters," in Q4 2019. Subsequently, in Q1 2020, the IRS completed its examination of the 2018 tax return whereby the IRS and Acme agreed to the final closing agreement. Acme does not intend to appeal or litigate any aspects of the examined UTPs, and it is remote that the IRS would examine or reexamine any aspects of the 2018 federal tax return. Refer to the table below for further facts on each of the UTPs.

Met

Recognition

Threshhold?

Amount of Tax BenefitLiability Recognized

in the

Financial

Statements*

Specifically

Examined?

Verbally

Communicated

In Q3?

Listed on

Q4 Form

906?

Benefit

Sustained**

UTP 1

Yes

60%

Yes

40%

UTP 2

UTP 3

Yes

20%

Yes

100%

UTP 4

Yes

65%

Yes

50%

UTP 5

Yes

70%

UTP 6

Yes

100%

Required:

1. For each tax position taken on its 2018 federal tax return:

a. When can Acme assert an "effective settlement"?

b. When should Acme adjust previously recognized amounts in the financial statements, if any?

2. Does Acme have a basis to change its assessment of similar tax positions taken in other periods if it concludes it meets the effective settlement conditions related to the UTPs included in its 2018 tax return?

Provide authoritative support for positions taken.

* Represents the amount of the tax benefit liability from the UTP the company recognized.For example, if the UTP resulted in a decrease of $100,000 to the overall tax liability and 70% of the benefit was recognized, the company recorded a $70,000 liability associated with the UTP assuming a liability would be recognized.

** Represents the percentage of the benefit taken under the UTP that the IRS allows after audit.For example, if the UTP reduced the total tax liability by $100,000 and the IRS allows 70% of the UTP, Acme would owe an additional $30,000 in taxes as a result of the audit. This amount is unknown if the IRS has not completed their audit of the UTP.