Add vivid adjectives and adverbs.

Weiske's face turned beet red when he started to answer this question and I couldn't understand why until years later when I got the FBI forensic report that was withheld from me and the jury at the trial. On the report it ruled me out as a suspect of forgery for Phyllis Sheneman and to look at other suspects. The government did not want the jury to know about this because all of the applications came from Weiske's office and were overnighted to nana and I never saw them which means either Weiske forged or knew who forged nana's name onto the applications. In order not to question Weiske about these applications, fabricated documents (Government 9B and 10B) were entered into evidence the day of the trial. Forensic evidence pointed out the reasons why these documents were not authentic including the misspelling of Phyllis Sheneman's name and the lack of dates on the applications. The authentic evidence was never presented at the trial because Weiske would have been questioned about the forged signatures of Phyllis Sheneman. My lawyer knew this but never said anything but instead asked the witness a leading question to testify against me after he had already testified numerous times that I told him that nana was looking to purchase investment properties. The information would have had to come from her anyway. It just made no sense that my "lawyer" would have asked that question.