Add vivid adjectives and adverbs

Weiske's face turned beet red when he nervously started to answer this question, and I couldn't understand why until years later when I received the detailed FBI forensic report that was mysteriously withheld from me and the jury at the trial. Before the trial, I was subpoenaed for a handwriting test of Nana's signature. I went through the motions, trusting that the system would see the truth, but they didn't. It was like my voice was stolen from me in a world that I never belonged to. The evidence was withheld, not just from me, but from the jury, from everyone who could have seen how it could clear my name. I didn't see that evidence until years after the trial was overyears when I lived in darkness, not knowing that the very thing that could exonerate me was kept hidden. The injustice weighed on me, as if every day after the trial was an extension of the punishment. I couldn't stop wondering, what would have happened if the jury had known? What would have changed if they had seen the truth? That thought haunts me to this day, and the injustice still echoes in every corner of my life.

In the report, it clearly ruled me out as a suspect of forgery for Phyllis Sheneman and suggested looking at other suspects. The government did not want the jury to know about this because all of the applications came from Weiske's office and were hastily overnighted to nana, and I never saw them, which means either Weiske deliberately forged or knew who forged nana's name onto the applications. I started to put two and two together and realized that in order not to question Weiske about these applications, fabricated documents (Government 9B and 10B) were suspiciously entered into evidence the day of the trial. Forensic evidence clearly pointed out the reasons why these documents were not authentic, including the glaring misspelling of Phyllis Sheneman's name and the notable lack of dates on the applications. The authentic evidence was never presented at the trial because Weiske would have been questioned about the forged signatures of Phyllis Sheneman. My lawyer knew this but never said anything, instead inexplicably asking the witness a leading question to testify against me after he had already testified numerous times that I told him that nana was looking to purchase investment properties. The information would have had to come from her anyway. It just made no sense that any defense lawyer would have asked that question.