After about one year in business, Sacha decided to exit Vision Works. While he enjoyed working with Mark and building the business, he didn't want to be tied down. Mark and Sacha negotiated an arrangement that saw Mark purchase Sacha's shares in the business, and Sacha resigned as a director. It was an amicable separation.

Six months later, Mark heard through industry connections that Sacha had secured a contract for a freelance job working on an animated feature film with Mixar Studios. It was a large project, and Sacha would have to hire other contractors to complete the job. Mark was very upset because Mark and Sacha had been in talks with Mixar for Vision Works to take on the contract before Sacha left the company. Mixar had approached Vision Works regarding the project because of the excellent work the company had done on an acclaimed animated short film. Sacha was the creative force behind the short film. They were negotiating terms with Mixar when Sacha announced he would be leaving the company. Mark broke off negotiations because he did not think he could take on a project like this without Sacha. Hearing that Sacha got the work makes Mark wonder if Sacha left Vision Works so that he could take the full benefit of the contract for himself.

What claim(s) could Vision Works bring against Sacha? What remedies would be available? In your analysis, include at least one case from BC or another Canadian jurisdiction that cites the law applicable to this problem.