Albert was being questioned by police about murder and was told by the officers that if he would just say what they wanted him to say that he would not be prosecuted. He was further assured that his family members agreed with the deal. He was later convicted for the murder based upon his confession. Was this promise not to prosecute a per se violation of the due process clause? Group of answer choices No, a promise not to prosecute does not render the confession to be per se inadmissible Yes, a promise not to prosecute is a per se violation of the Due Process clause No, the evaluation of the confession by the court should be determined on the basis of whether the promise overbore the will of Albert and impaired his capacity for self-determination No, both a promise not to prosecute does not render the confession to be per se inadmissible, and the evaluation of the confession by the court should be determined on the basis of whether the promise overbore the will of Albert and impaired his capacity for self-determination