Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Albert was being questioned by police about murder and was told by the officers that if he would just say what they wanted him to
Albert was being questioned by police about murder and was told by the officers that if he would just say what they wanted him to say that he would not be prosecuted. He was further assured that his family members agreed with the deal. He was later convicted for the murder based upon his confession. Was this promise not to prosecute a per se violation of the due process clause? Group of answer choices No, a promise not to prosecute does not render the confession to be per se inadmissible Yes, a promise not to prosecute is a per se violation of the Due Process clause No, the evaluation of the confession by the court should be determined on the basis of whether the promise overbore the will of Albert and impaired his capacity for self-determination No, both a promise not to prosecute does not render the confession to be per se inadmissible, and the evaluation of the confession by the court should be determined on the basis of whether the promise overbore the will of Albert and impaired his capacity for self-determination
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started