Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Alfrendo bought Belinda's property through Cassy, an agent with a special power of attorney (SPA) to sell the property. When Alfrendo was ready to pay
Alfrendo bought Belinda's property through Cassy, an agent with a special power of attorney (SPA) to sell the property. When Alfrendo was ready to pay the agreed amount as scheduled, Belinda communicated, directing Alfrendo to pay directly to her. Upon learning what Belinda said to Alfrendo, Cassy (Belinda's agent), told Alfrendo to pay through her since she was authorized under the SPA and to protect her commission. Faced with two claimants, Alfrendo consigned the payment in court. Belinda protested the consignment claiming that it is ineffective since no tender of payment was made to her. Is Belinda correct? * [C Yes, since Alfrendo made no announcement of the tender. No. Consignation without tender of payment is allowed in view of the conflicting claims on the plaintiff. O Yes, as the owner of the property sold, Belinda can demand payment directly to herself. O No, tender of payment is required for a valid consignation.While driving along Jusko Napakamahal Highway, Mula Lah suffered a busted tire. Not having any spare tire, he went to a nearby spare parts store to buy a new tire. However, Mr. Lah did not have sufficient money with him. He then remembered his good friend, Galan Teh who happened to know Akoh Owna, the spare parts store owner. When Mr. Lah called/phoned Mr. Teh to ask for help, the latter willingly instructed Mr. Lah to give the phone to Mr Ownan and said, "Ako na bahala, kung di makabayad si Mr. Lah sa 'yo, ako na magbabayad pare." (Don't worry, if Mr. Lah cannot pay, just charge me for the cost). Mr. Lah was able to get the tire and resumed his trip along Jusko Napakamahal Highway. Which of the following statements is correct? * O Mr. Owna can enforce the promise made by Mr. Teh because it was witnessed by Mr. Lah. () If Mr. Lah cannot pay, Mr. Owna can proceed against Mr. Teh to make good his promise to pay Mr. Lah's debi () Mr. Teh's promise cannot be enforced against him because the promise was not made in writing. O Mr. Owna can enfore the promise made by Mr. Teh because it is presumed that he issued an invoice when he gave the tire to Mr. Lah.James was supposed to pay Nadine P100,000.00 on 27 January 2020. Believing that the obligation was due and demandable already on 27 January 2019, James paid Nadine the amount of #100,000.00 on said date. How much may James recover from Nadine on 30 June 2019? *[ O #10,000 plus interest because when James effected payment, he unaware of the period O #100,000.00 without interest because James voluntarily paid his obligation None, because James voluntarily paid his obligation O #50,000.00 because 1/2 year has elapsed after James effected paymentJenina orally offered to her parcel of land located in Malolos, Bulacan to Vanessa for $500,000.00. It was agreed upon by the parties that the land will be delivered through the execution of a notarized Deed of Sale and the price is to be paid directly two weeks from their oral agreement. Which of the following statements is the most accurate? * O If Jenina refused to deliver the land, Vanessa may successfully sue her for the fulfillment of the obligation before the payment of the purchase price. O If Jenina refuses to deliver the land on the agreed date despite payment made by Vanessa, the latter may not successfully sue Jenina because the contract is unenforceable. The contract between the parties is subject to ratification. The contract between the parties is rescissio.Antonio donated his house and lot to Juan. The donation and the acceptance was made in writing. Juan now wants to register the house and lot under his name. However. a public instrument is needed. Can Juan compel Antonio to execute the needed public instrument? * 0 Yes; because the donation between the parties was made in compliance with the Statute of Frauds. O No] because the donation between the parties is 1.roid. O No; because the donation between the parties was made not in compliance with the Statute of Frauds. D Yes. because the donation between the parties is 1.'a|id
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started