All the answers should come from these two cases exclusively, and you should not involve any other cases.

1- 3M case: 3M became world renowned for its capacity to innovate internally. For the purpose of this assessment, treat the 3M case as the benchmark company. The name of case study is "GIVING EMPLOYEES PERMISSION TO FAIL IS A FORMULA FOR INNOVATION AT 3M" easily downloadable from aem.org

2-Microsoft case-Microsoft became too 'operational', which inhibited innovation. The company decided to change course and become more innovative. The name of case study is "Microsoft retakes the innovation crown with its new focus on creativity" downloadable from ideatovalue.com

All solution must follow the following format

1. Claim 1. Claim: State the premise or restate the question you will answer 2. Logic: According to credible source, 2. Logic 3. Data explain how it works 3. Data: Explain the relevant data as it fits the Logic above 4. Useful 4. Conclusion: Restate premise or answer Conclusion the question based on the Data & Logic above 5. Quali- 5. Qualification: What options/ recommendations / advantages or fication next? disadvantages are indicated? What Claim-Logic-Data in 5-part Paragraph