An engineering project at a lithium battery-based manufacturing company was chosen from 3 alternatives, namely: 1. Alternative A: Dry Battery Factory to Replace Motorcycle Wet Battery (Product A) 2. Alternative B: Battery Pack Factory for Convertible Electric Motorcycle (Product B) 3. Alternative C: SWAP Battery Factory for Electric Motorcycles (Product C) All three alternatives have the same life cycle, which is 10 years. However, the three alternatives have differences in investment value, annual operating costs, year-end residual value, with the following data: Notes: Project evaluation uses a Minimum Attractive of Return (MARR) value of 10% per vear Each evaluation should be conducted in a structured manner using the "Technical Economic Analysis Procedure" B-1: If it is assumed that all alternatives have the same income, which project should the company choose? Use present worth analysis If it turns out that each alternative has a different income, where a market analysis has been carried out to determine the projected demand (demand) and selling price of the products of the three products, it is known as follows: Based on the above data, determine: B-2: Which project provides the greatest profit? Use the Present Worth method! B-3: If the company will only run projects with a maximum Payback Period (PBP) value criterion of 5 years and 6 months, which projects might be chosen