An important question that arises in recent historiography is that of the status of the notion of \"global history.\" One important reason for thinking globally as an historian is the fact that the history disciplinesince the Greekshas tended to be Eurocentric in its choice of topics, framing assumptions, and methods. Economic and political history, for example, often privileges the industrial revolution in England and the creation of the modern bureaucratic state in France, Britain, and Germany, as being exemplars of \"modern\" development in economics and politics. This has led to a tendency to look at other countries' development as non-standard or sttmted. So global history is, in part, a framework within which the historian avoids privileging one regional center as primary and others as secondary or peripheral. Bin Wong makes this point in Chino Transformed (Wong 1997)