An offender of impaired driving causing death participates in a successful Restorative Justice dialogue with the victim's family before sentencing, where the family requests that the offender be sentenced to community service doing public speaking to high school students. If a different offender is also charged with impaired driving causing death in an unrelated case, but the victim's family chooses not to participate in Restorative Justice, should these two offenders be sentenced differently by a judge? You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads.