answer the following questions giving reasons for answers:

a. Assuming the contract does not have a choice of law provision, what law will govern this sales contract ?

b. What do you think should be added to the arbritation clause (if anything) and why?

c. Assume that you work for the British corporation and that your boss says "ICC is a French body. Do we really want a Frenxh body to decide the dispute? That may go against our interests! We should not wccept this arbritation clause." What donyou say in reply to this remark?

d. Based on your international sales law knowledge obtained , how would you comment on the effectiveness of international sales law system? Anything you would like to suggest for the system to improve ?

A French company. Telequlp SAS, and a Eritish compamy. NetComm Ltd. are drafting a contract for the delivery of telecommurications equipment. Telequip SAS specializes in manutacturing cutting-edge teiecommunication devices, while NetComm Lh. is a leading teiecommunkations service provider in the UK. The total value of the contract is 6.2 milion, and the equigment is to be delivered in three instalinents over a 12-month period. The following arbitration clause is in the draft contract: All disputes arising out of or h connection with the present contract shall be finally settled under the flules of Arbitration at the Intemational Chamber of Commerce by one or more arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules