Anything written in parenthesis or a blank $ need answers Thanks Problem 12 22 (LO 3, 7) Paul Chaing acquires a qualifying historic structure for $350,000 (excluding the cost of the land) and plans to substantially rehabilitate the structure He is planning to spend either $320,000 or $380,000 on rehabilitation expenditures Complete the letter to Paul and the memo for the tax research files that outlines the two alternative expenditures, which includes The computation that determines the rehabilitation expenditures tax credit available to Paul The effect of the credit on Paul's adjusted basis in the property The cash flow differences as a result of the tax consequences related to his expenditure choice Money, Young, Nellen, Persellin, CPAs 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH 45040 September 27, 2020 Mr Paul Chaing 4522 Fargo Street Geneva, IL 60134 Dear Mr Chaing This letter is in response to your questions concerning the availability of the rehabilitation tax credit for expenditures that you plan to incur in the rehabilitation of your qualifying historic structure and their impact on the cost recovery basis of the structure It is our understanding that you purchased the qualifying historic structure for $350,000 and that you intend to incur rehabilitation expenditures of either $320,000 or $380,000 For the credit to be available, the law requires that a taxpayer substantially rehabilitate the structure If you incurred rehabilitation expenditures of $320,000, the credit WOULD WOULD NOT be available and the cost recovery basis of the structure would be $ By incurring $380,000 on rehabilitation expenditures, the credit WOULD WOULD NOT be available and the cost recovery basis of the structure would be $ Because the rehabilitation tax credit is available if you choose the renovation plan costing $320,000 $380,000 , you need to consider carefully the impact the credit will have on your short term cash flow position Based solely on current cash flow due to the cost of the two projects and the potential tax credit, you WOULD WOULD NOT benefit by selecting the more expensive renovation project The net cash flow GAIN LOSS would be $ Of course, other considerations, including the reduced depreciation deduction associated with the credit, may impact your decision, but the benefit of the tax credit is indisputable Should you need more information or need clarification of our conclusions, please feel free to contact me Sincerely, Emily Jang, CPA Partner TAX FILE MEMORANDUM September 27, 2020 FROM Emily Jang, CPA SUBJECT Mr Paul Chaing Impact of the Rehabilitation Tax Credit Paul Chaing has acquired a qualifying historic structure for $350,000 with the intention of substantially rehabilitating the building He has inquired as to the availability of the rehabilitation tax credit and its impact on the structure's cost recovery basis if he incurs either $320,000 or $380,000 of qualifying rehabilitation expenditures To qualify for the rehabilitation credit, Paul must substantially rehabilitate the structure The substantial rehabilitation requirement provides that a taxpayer MUST MAY NOT incur rehabilitation expenditures that exceed the greater of (1) the adjusted basis of the property BEFORE AFTER the rehabilitation ($350,000), or (2) $ Therefore, if Paul chose to incur only $320,000 on the rehabilitation, the amount WOULD WOULD NOT be enough to qualify as a substantial rehabilitation and CREDIT NO CREDIT would be available The depreciable basis of the property would be the sum of its original cost plus the capital improvements, or $ If Paul incurred $ for the rehabilitation project, a substantial rehabilitation would result Therefore, the rehabilitation tax credit available to Paul would be $ The depreciable basis of the property, which would be reduced by the full amount of the credit, would be $ Although other considerations would likely be relevant to Mr Chaing while he decides which of the two renovation projects to pursue, certainly the impact of the rehabilitation tax credit on the current cash flow SHOULD SHOULD NOT be overlooked If he decides to undertake the more expensive project, the higher cost would be more than offset in the current year by the benefit he would receive from the tax credit Thus, the short term cash flow advantage would total $ Note that this cash flow advantage would be reduced slightly by the smaller depreciation deduction associated with the credit

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Sep 19, 2024

Anything written in parenthesis or a blank $ need answers!! Thanks Problem 12-22 (LO. 3, 7) Paul Chaing acquires a qualifying historic structure for $350,000

Anything written in parenthesis or a blank $ need answers!! Thanks

Problem 12-22 (LO. 3, 7)

Paul Chaing acquires a qualifying historic structure for $350,000 (excluding the cost of the land) and plans to substantially rehabilitate the structure. He is planning to spend either $320,000 or $380,000 on rehabilitation expenditures.

Complete the letter to Paul and the memo for the tax research files that outlines the two alternative expenditures, which includes:

The computation that determines the rehabilitation expenditures tax credit available to Paul.
The effect of the credit on Paul's adjusted basis in the property.
The cash-flow differences as a result of the tax consequences related to his expenditure choice.

Money, Young, Nellen, & Persellin, CPAs 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH 45040

September 27, 2020
Mr. Paul Chaing 4522 Fargo Street Geneva, IL 60134
Dear Mr. Chaing:
This letter is in response to your questions concerning the availability of the rehabilitation tax credit for expenditures that you plan to incur in the rehabilitation of your qualifying historic structure and their impact on the cost recovery basis of the structure. It is our understanding that you purchased the qualifying historic structure for $350,000 and that you intend to incur rehabilitation expenditures of either $320,000 or $380,000.
For the credit to be available, the law requires that a taxpayer substantially rehabilitate the structure. If you incurred rehabilitation expenditures of $320,000, the credit [WOULD/WOULD NOT] be available and the cost recovery basis of the structure would be $_.
By incurring $380,000 on rehabilitation expenditures, the credit [WOULD/WOULD NOT] be available and the cost recovery basis of the structure would be $_.
Because the rehabilitation tax credit is available if you choose the renovation plan costing [$320,000/$380,000] , you need to consider carefully the impact the credit will have on your short-term cash-flow position. Based solely on current cash flow due to the cost of the two projects and the potential tax credit, you [WOULD/WOULD NOT] benefit by selecting the more expensive renovation project. The net cash flow [GAIN/LOSS] would be $_. Of course, other considerations, including the reduced depreciation deduction associated with the credit, may impact your decision, but the benefit of the tax credit is indisputable.
Should you need more information or need clarification of our conclusions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,

Emily Jang, CPA Partner
TAX FILE MEMORANDUM
September 27, 2020
FROM: Emily Jang, CPA
SUBJECT: Mr. Paul Chaing Impact of the Rehabilitation Tax Credit
Paul Chaing has acquired a qualifying historic structure for $350,000 with the intention of substantially rehabilitating the building. He has inquired as to the availability of the rehabilitation tax credit and its impact on the structure's cost recovery basis if he incurs either $320,000 or $380,000 of qualifying rehabilitation expenditures.
To qualify for the rehabilitation credit, Paul must substantially rehabilitate the structure. The substantial rehabilitation requirement provides that a taxpayer [MUST/MAY NOT] incur rehabilitation expenditures that exceed the greater of (1) the adjusted basis of the property [BEFORE/AFTER] the rehabilitation ($350,000), or (2) $_. Therefore, if Paul chose to incur only $320,000 on the rehabilitation, the amount [WOULD/WOULD NOT] be enough to qualify as a "substantial rehabilitation" and [CREDIT/NO CREDIT] would be available. The depreciable basis of the property would be the sum of its original cost plus the capital improvements, or $_.
If Paul incurred $_ for the rehabilitation project, a substantial rehabilitation would result. Therefore, the rehabilitation tax credit available to Paul would be $_. The depreciable basis of the property, which would be reduced by the full amount of the credit, would be $_.
Although other considerations would likely be relevant to Mr. Chaing while he decides which of the two renovation projects to pursue, certainly the impact of the rehabilitation tax credit on the current cash flow [SHOULD/SHOULD NOT] be overlooked. If he decides to undertake the more expensive project, the higher cost would be more than offset in the current year by the benefit he would receive from the tax credit. Thus, the short-term cash flow advantage would total $_. Note that this cash-flow advantage would be reduced slightly by the smaller depreciation deduction associated with the credit.