Question
Apples and Googles ending inventory amounts (in $ millions) are shown below: Apple Google 2017 2016 2017 2016 Ending inventory $ 4,855 $ 2,132 $
Apples and Googles ending inventory amounts (in $ millions) are shown below:
Apple | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Ending inventory | $ | 4,855 | $ | 2,132 | $ | 749 | $ | 268 | |||||||
Required: 1. Assume Apple uses variable costing for some of its internal reports. For 2017, would net income based on variable costing be higher, lower, or no different from net income based on absorption costing? 2. Assume Google uses variable costing for some of its internal reports. For 2017, would net income based on variable costing be higher, lower, or no different from net income based on absorption costing? 3. Assume both companies are considering implementing just-in-time (JIT) inventory systems. After implementing JIT systems, would differences in income between absorption costing and variable costing be more likely to increase or to decrease?
Required 1 Required 2 Required 3 Assume Apple uses variable costing for some of its internal reports. For 2017, would net income based on variable costing be higher, lower, or no different from net income based on absorption costing? Net income under variable costing Required 1 Required 2 Required 3 Assume Google uses variable costing for some of its internal reports. For 2017, would net income based on variable costing be higher, lower, or no different from net income based on absorption costing? Net income under variable costingStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started