As a result of studying MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, et al., Petitioners v. UNITED STATES, we can conclude:

A.That the courts determine whether a regulation is interpretive or legislative (legislative being more authoritative than interpretive) depending on the statutes specificity.

B.That the courts determine whether a regulation is interpretive or legislative (interpretive being more authoritative than legislative) depending on the statutes specificity.

C.That the courts determine whether a statute is interpretive or legislative (interpretive being more authoritative than legislative) depending on the regulations specificity.

D.That the courts determine whether a statute is interpretive or legislative (legislative being more authoritative than interpretive) depending on the regulations specificity

E.None of the other choices are correct.