Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

At time 0 your company has 100 of cash on its bank account and it might immediately distribute it as a dividend, which would drive

image text in transcribed

At time 0 your company has 100 of cash on its bank account and it might immediately distribute it as a dividend, which would drive its cash balance down to zero. The company has no debt. At time 1 two equally likely alternative scenarios might occur: Scenario 1 There is no positive NPV investment, and the value of the assets in place will depend on the state of the world at time 2: Pr(State 1)=1 Pr(State 2) Assets in Place 150 250 NPV new investment 0 0 Scenario 2 There is a positive NPV (risky) investment costing 100. Both the NPV of the risky investment and the value of the assets in place will depend on the state of the world at time 2: Pr(State 1)= Pr(State 2)=2 Assets in Place 150 250 NPV new investment 20 10 In case at time 1 the company has a 0 cash balance, it can only raise the funds for the new investment by issuing new equity. The management of the company works in the interest of existing (current) shareholders, and it already knows the state of the world (that will be realized at time 2) at time 1. All other agents will only know the state of the world at time 2. Finally assume that all agents are risk neutral and that the interest rate is equal to zero. If the company distributes the 100 in cash as dividend at time 0 By how much would the company's equity value change at time 0 following the dividend payment? Does the Modigliani Miller dividend policy irrelevance argument hold true in this case? Why? At time 0 your company has 100 of cash on its bank account and it might immediately distribute it as a dividend, which would drive its cash balance down to zero. The company has no debt. At time 1 two equally likely alternative scenarios might occur: Scenario 1 There is no positive NPV investment, and the value of the assets in place will depend on the state of the world at time 2: Pr(State 1)=1 Pr(State 2) Assets in Place 150 250 NPV new investment 0 0 Scenario 2 There is a positive NPV (risky) investment costing 100. Both the NPV of the risky investment and the value of the assets in place will depend on the state of the world at time 2: Pr(State 1)= Pr(State 2)=2 Assets in Place 150 250 NPV new investment 20 10 In case at time 1 the company has a 0 cash balance, it can only raise the funds for the new investment by issuing new equity. The management of the company works in the interest of existing (current) shareholders, and it already knows the state of the world (that will be realized at time 2) at time 1. All other agents will only know the state of the world at time 2. Finally assume that all agents are risk neutral and that the interest rate is equal to zero. If the company distributes the 100 in cash as dividend at time 0 By how much would the company's equity value change at time 0 following the dividend payment? Does the Modigliani Miller dividend policy irrelevance argument hold true in this case? Why

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Handbook Of Investing In Todays Financial Markets

Authors: Alessandro De Cristofaro

1st Edition

1070350931, 978-1070350936

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions