Based on Canadian law, please give correct answers and explanations.

Question 11 (1 point) You will recall from the Workplace Law video Human Rights Fact Pattern: Xtreme Madness, that Gail Thorel was employed as a graphic designer with a video game developer called Xtreme Madness. A colleague of Ms. Thorel's, Amir Sauvey, had complained to their supervisor about Ms. Thorel loudly voicing her religious beliefs on homosexuality while at work. When their supervisor and the HR director met with Ms. Thorel and told her that her desk was being moved to a separate area and that she was no longer permitted to speak about her religious beliefs at work, Ms. Thorel stormed out of the office and filed a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal. In what protected social area would Ms. Thorel ground her claim? 0 a) Membership in a vocational association because, as a graphic designer, Ms. Thorel was a member of the Graphic Designers of Canada (GDC), and she was entitled to a discrimination-free work environment under the GDC Code of Ethics. 0 b) Employment because Ms. Thorel was at work when she experienced discrimination. O c) Contracts because Ms. Thorel is bound by an employment contract with X- treme Madness. 0 d) Services because Ms. Thorel works for a company, X-treme Madness, which provides video game development services to clients. Question 12 (1 point) Is it relevant that Ms. Thorel holds genuine and deeply held religious beliefs? 0 a) Yes, under the Ontario Human Rights Code, to qualify as a protected ground Ms. Thorel's religious beliefs must be genuine and deeply held. 0 b) N0, M5. Thorel's complaint would be better filed under the Employment Standards Act, which doesn't require religious beliefs to be genuine or deeply held. 0 c) No, it doesn't matter how genuine or deeply held Ms. Thorel's religious beliefs are for her to make a claim under the Ontario Human Rights Code. 0 d) Yes, under the Ontario Human Rights Code, Ms. Thorel's religious beliefs must be genuine and deeply held, and must include belief in a single God, as is the case with Christian fundamentalists. Question 13 (1 point) Was instructing Ms. Thorel not to speak about her religious beliefs at work discrimination under the Ontario Human Rights Code? 0 a) Yes, it was discrimination, but it was permissible discrimination. O b) Yes, X-treme Madness has a limitless duty under the Human Rights Code to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs. 0 c) N0, M5. Thorel did not suffer discrimination because discussing her religious beliefs at work was unprofessional. Q d) Yes, Ms. Thorel has every right to speak about her religious beliefs at work. Question 14 (5 points) What, if any, defence(s) does X-treme Madness have to Ms. Thorel's claim? Explain. Paragraph V BIUVA + . . .Question 15 (1 point) Does Mr. Sauvey have any basis to make a claim under the Human Rights Code? (a) Yes, Mr. Sauvey could make a claim under sexual harassment. ( b) No, Mr. Sauvey must wait until Ms. Thorel addresses him directly when she is speaking about her religious beliefs on homosexuality. (c) No, Mr. Sauvey must first wait to see if his employer acts on his complaint. Od) Yes, Mr. Sauvey could make a claim under poisoned environment.Question 16 (1 point) If Mr. Sauvey were to make a claim under the Human Rights Code, against whom could he make such a claim? 0 a) Ms. Thorel and X-treme Madness, but not the supervisor because the supervisor provided an accommodation to eliminate the discriminatory behaviour. 0 b) Mr. Sauvey could make a claim against Ms. Thorel, the supervisor, and the employer. 0 c) Ms. Thorel because she was independently responsible for the discriminatory conduct 0 d) The supervisor because they hadn't done anything to stop Ms. Thorel. 0 e) X-treme Madness because, as the employer, they were responsible for ensuring a workplace free from discrimination and harassment and they allowed Ms. Thorel to express her religious beliefs at work. Question 17 (5 points) In the discrimination claim made by Ms. Thorel, who do you think will prevail? Who do you think should prevail? Explain your position. Paragraph