Ben Jones sues the federal government, challenging the Affordable Care Act's constitutionality of state insurance exchanges. It is discovered that he has benefitted under the law, having obtained 100% subsidized health insurance through California's state exchange. Would the Supreme Court takje the case and on what grounds? No, he is a benefitted litigant so he lacks standing to sue No, this is a political question yes...he has standing since he has been harmed by the law No; this case fails the ripeness test No, the case fails the adequate and independent grounds test