Betsy enters a restaurant and checks her coat with a restaurant employee. After dinner, she retrieves her coat and discovers that her wallet, which she had left in her coat pocket, is missing. The restaurant is:

A)Liable to Betsy for the value of the wallet and its contents because it failed to exercise reasonable care over the bailed propertyB)Not liable to Betsy because it did not know the wallet was in the coat pocket, and therefore no bailment existed as to the walletC)Liable to Betsy regardless of fault under the doctrine of strict liabilityD)Not liable to Betsy because this was an involuntary bailment, and therefore the restaurant was required to exercise only slight care in preserving the bailed property