Question
Beverly Tull had worked for Atchison Leather Products, Inc., in Kansas for ten years when, in 1999, she began to complain of hand, wrist, and
Beverly Tull had worked for Atchison Leather Products, Inc., in Kansas for ten years when, in 1999, she began to complain of hand, wrist, and shoulder pain. Atchison recommended that she contact a certain physician, who in April 2000 diagnosed the condition as carpal tunnel syndrome severe enough for surgery. In August, Tull filed a claim with the state workers compensation board. Because Atchison changed workers compensation insurance companies every year, a dispute arose as to which company should pay Tulls claim. Fearing liability, no insurer would authorize treatment, and Tull was forced to delay surgery until December. The board granted her temporary total disability benefits for the sub-sequent six weeks that she missed work. On April 23, 2002, Berger Co. bought Atchison. The new employer adjusted Tulls work so that it was less demanding and stressful, but she continued to suffer pain. In July, a physician diagnosed her condition as permanent. The board granted her permanent partial disability benefits. By May 2005, the bickering over the financial responsibility for Tulls claim involved five insurers four of which had each covered Atchison for a single year and one of which covered Berger.
When an injured employee files a claim for workers compensation, a proceeding is held to assess the injury and determine the amount of compensation. Should a dispute between insurers over the payment of the claim be resolved in the same meeting? Why or why not?
The Board designated April 23, 2002, as the date of Tulls injury. What is the reason for determining the date of a worker's injury? Should the board in this case have selected this date or a different date? Why?
How should the board assess liability for the payment of Tulls medical expenses and disability benefits? Would it be appropriate to impose joint and several liability on the insurers holding each of them responsible for the full amount of damages, or should the individual liability of each of them be determined? (Explain your response.)
(Remember not to look up the case or post information from the case decision until after I have posted the case decision. If you respond to these questions, do so by applying the information from the text and forming your own opinion.)
please write 2-3 paragraphs
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started