Brent Perry works as a guide and conservationist for an ornithological tourism company, which is part of an emerging industry catering to birders.He recently surveyed the bird populations in some preserved deciduous woodlands in Northern New Jersey.In particular, he was looking for Baltimore Orioles who surprisingly to some have taken up residence in Jersey elms and maples.On five random visits each along five separate and independent mile-long pathways (Trails A through E), he recorded the following numbers of sightings of Baltimore Orioles:

Trail A 8 16 8 12 16

Trail B 1. 15. 9. 8 7

Trail C 22 10 16 10. 22

Trail D 19 29 24. 29 19

Trail E. 16. 24. 16. 24 20

He kept other variables about his bird watching as constant as he reasonably could.He wonders if all five pathways provide comparable opportunities to spot these orange-plumed birds.Help Brent with his analysis by completing the following organizer after performing the relevant testing at the 0.5% level of significance.Round off any decimals to five decimal places if necessary.

Record your response to item #19 here,the Sum of Squares (SS) for Total.

Answer:

Record your response to item #20 here,the degrees of freedom(df) for Treatments or Between Samples.

Answer:

Record your response to item #21 here,the degrees of freedom(df) for Error or Within Samples.

Answer:

Record your response to item #22 here,the degrees of freedom(df) for Total.

Answer:

Record your response to item #23 here,the Mean Square (MS) for Treatments or Between Samples.

Answer:

Record your response to item #24 here,the Mean Square (MS) for Error or Within Samples.

Answer:

Record your response to item #25 here,the test statistic,ForFtest.

Answer:

Record your response to item #26 here,thep-value.

Answer:

Record your response to item #27 here,the critical value,Fcrit.

Answer:

What is the most appropriate technical conclusion inferred from the results fortreatmentsorbetween samples, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance?{Select the best response.}

a.Response (a):Brent should highly reject the null hypothesis.

b.Response (b):Brent should reject the null hypothesis.

c.Response (c):Brent should marginally reject the null hypothesis.

d.Response (d):Brent should highly fail to reject the null hypothesis.

e.Response (e):Brent should fail to reject the null hypothesis.

f.Response (f):Brent should marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis.

What is the most appropriate contextual conclusion inferred fortreatmentsorbetween samples, again based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance?{Select the best response.}

a.Response (a):It is marginally reasonable to claim all pathways provide comparable bird watching.

b.Response (b):It is reasonable to claim that all pathways provide comparable bird watching.

c.Response (c):It is highly reasonable to claim that all pathways provide comparable bird watching.

d.Response (d):It is marginally unreasonable to claim all pathways provide comparable bird watching.

e.Response (e):It is unreasonable to claim that all pathways provide comparable bird watching.

f.Response (f):It is highly unreasonable to claim that all pathways provide comparable bird watching.

Record your response to item #30 here:what is the total sample size,n?

Answer:

Record your response to item #31 here:what is the total number of treatments,k?

Answer: