Can you please comment on what I did well and what I could have done differently in the following response I wrote? Here is the question I had to respond to:What is the 5th Amendment right to a grand jury? What is the grand jury provision of the 5th Amendment meant to protect? Why might the founding fathers include such a provision in the Bill of Rights? Does the grand jury system suffer from any flaws? Is the grand jury still an effective mechanism of the judicial system? Explain. And here is my response:The 5th Amendment's grand jury right is a bit like a community coming together to ensure someone isn't unfairly accused of a serious crime without enough evidence. It's there to protect individuals from baseless accusations, embodying the founding fathers' deep commitment to fairness and justice before the law. They included this in the Bill of Rights to prevent the government from charging someone without a solid reason, valuing the community's input in such serious matters. However, the system isn't without flaws. It tends to favor the prosecutor's side since the defense doesn't usually present its case, and the secrecy of proceedings can obscure fairness. Despite these issues, the grand jury system remains a crucial safeguard in our judicial process, aiming to ensure that trials proceed only with sufficient evidence. It reflects our collective effort to balance fairness with the complexities of justice, evolving over time to better serve the community's welfare.