can you please provide an explanation for this question?

If I contract with an artist to paint a picture of my wife for our 30th anniversary, but I do not put the contract in writing, it is just verbal, and the cost of the painting is $6,000, then if I change my mind, and do not want to pay for the painting even if the court decides that the painting that the artist did was a service, not a good: a. I will not have to pay for the painting because of the Statute of Frauds. b. I will not have to pay for the painting, because of the price. c. a and b d. I will have to pay for the painting, because it is a service. e. I will have to pay for the painting, because of the Statute of Refusal